
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Kristin Scott Thomas (1960-)

Wednesday, November 12, 2008
You Heard It Here First...


Thursday, November 6, 2008
Listmania: 15 Best Costume Designed Film Post 1990*

#15 BULLETS OVER BROADWAY (1994) Jeffrey Kurland. Silent screen spectacularness in a rare Woody Allen period piece.
#14 THE WINGS OF THE DOVE (1997) Sandy Powell. The people of Venice have never looked better.
#13 GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING (2003) Dien Van Straalen. Like a living breathing painting.
#12 RICHARD III (1995) Shuna Harwood. Dystopian Shakespearean nightmare enhanced by fantastic 30's creations.
#11 THE ENGLISH PATIENT (1996). Ann Roth [Oscar]. Relatively conventional work is no less powerful than more out-there stuff. Kristin Scott Thomas’ floating white dress says it all.

#10 THE BROTHERS GRIMM (2005) Gabriella Pescucci. Just look at Monica Bellucci’s witch for a reason why.
#08 EDWARD SCISSORHANDS (1990) Colleen Atwood. There’s nothing quite like that dominatrix jumpsuit.
#07 CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY (2005) Gabriella Pescucci. Willy Wonka’s purple jacket says it all.
#06 GANGS OF NEW YORK (2002) Sandy Powell. Outlined above.

*hardly definitive. I’m likely to change my mind at the drop of a hat once I think of some I’ve forgotten.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Doubt Poster

The Up and Up of Penelop Cruz
Dark City - Director's Cut

If you are yet to discover this forgotten masterpiece, now is the time. The most underrated movie of 1998 and the best Sci-fi Noir since 'Blade Runner'. The dvd features two making-ofs, a trailer and a director's commentary by Proyas and the screenwriters. It also features an engrossing commentary by Roger Ebert who has been one of the film's most enthusiastic supporters.
Read his original review here: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19980227/REVIEWS/802270304/1023
and his 2005 follow-up here: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051106/REVIEWS08/511060302/1023
Thoughts on Nicole...

Nicole has not weakened as an actress, but her films don't connect. She has been blamed time and time again for the failures of her projects, but she is by far the best thing about most of them. She was easily the best thing about 'The Golden Compass' and 'The Invasion' - two of the more notorious floperoos. Reviews for her performances have also remained strong, but this never manages to translate into Oscar success. Following 'CM' Nicole appeared in Jonathan Glazer's 'Sexy Beast' follow-up 'Birth'. The film was understandably too strange for Oscar voters, but it remains one of the best films - and definitely the most underrated - of 2004. Nicole's performance is unflinching - the close-up at the opera says everything in one shot - and it should have garnered her another nomination at least - it did not. 2005 saw the 'Interpreter' - not great - not oscar-bait. 2006 had 'Fur' - too strange and then came 2007. Noah Baumbach had just come off raves for 2005's 'The Squid and the Whale' and was now following it up with the eagerly awaited 'Margot at the Wedding' in which Nicole would play the title character. Kidman was brilliant as the truly despicable Margot and it should remain one of the high points of her career. It's the first time she'd really let loose since 'Moulin Rouge' and she doesn't hold back in making Margot as unlikeable as possible. I new the likeability was a factor, but surely such greatness couldn't be ignored? It was. The film received mediocre reviews (although the praise for Kidman was certainly there) and was completely ignored come awards season (sigh). I've become used to disappointment now, but come on ... cursed? surely not.

Friday, October 17, 2008
The 1966 OZ Awards: "You are invited for a night of fun and games..."
For me, the obvious Best Picture winner of the year was 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?' adapted from the play by Edward Albee. Whereas 'A Man for All Seasons' is an example of a film attempting (and failing) to 'open up' a play, 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?' is a prime case of a film sticking to its guns and playing to its strengths ie. Its characters, its dialogue and its story while still remaining a separated beast to its stage incarnation. The film's many strong points include the cinematography by Haskell Wexler and the costume/production design which make George (Burton) and Martha's (Elizabeth Taylor) house seem like a claustrophibic mad house (this is even before the antogonists begin to unravel). What really sells the film though is its performances. Richard Burton is forceful and strong while still coming of down-trodden and aloof (not an easy task). It is the performance of his career and is even greater for the way he plays of his co-stars and evolves into the ringmaster of the entire piece.
Speaking of career best performances, you can't go past Elizabeth Taylor as the loud mouthed and downright unpleasant spouse of Burton's college professor. Taylor defies all prior held perceptions of who she was as an actress by completely inhabiting the role. She walks a fine line between power and caricature but manages to bring it all back with some genuinely poignant moments of self reflection. Taylor won a deserved Oscar here and I have to agree with the accolades. In support, George Segal is wonderful, but Sandy Dennis (in another Oscar winning role) is truly revelatory. Playing Honey, the wife of Segal's new arrival biology professor ('he's in the maaaath department') Dennis arguably has the most difficult role. She has to be the observer of the chaos along with her husband, while also becoming a part of the insanity, before descending into a figure of pure pity. Her quirky nature made for a startling and disarming film debut.
While George Segal is the equal of his costars, my final performance award for this year must be given to Robert Shaw for his portrayal of King Henry VIII in 'A Man for All Seasons'. His completely OTT and raucous performance is the one light in the gloom that is this film. It can only be described as magic. My close runner-up to 'Woolf' as Best Picture is Michelangelo Antonioni's masterpiece 'Blow-Up' (more on that film in later posts). I awarded Antonioni the Best Director prize as his work does represent a slightly more cinematic approach than the debut work of Mike Nichols and shows a huge leap in his own career. Nichols would reach his zenith only the next year with 'The Graduate'.
My other multiple winner (and 2nd Runner-Up) is Federico Fellini's 'Juliet of the Spirits' (made in '65, released in the US in '66). The film wins for its magnificent costume and production design and also for its brilliant score by Fellini veteran Nino Rota. All winners listed below:
Best Picture: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Actor in a Leading Role: Richard Burton, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Actress in a Leading Role: Elizabeth Taylor, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Actor in a Supporting Role: Robert Shaw, A Man for All Seasons
Actress in a Supporting Role: Sandy Dennis, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Director: Michelangelo Antonioni, Blow-Up
Original Screenplay: Blow-Up
Adapted Screenplay: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Black & White Cinematography, Production/Costume Design, Film Editing, Sound Mixing: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Colour Cinematography: Blow-Up
Colour Production/Costume Design, Original Score: Juliet of the Spirits
Sound /Visual Effects: Fantastic Voyage
Original Song: "Georgy Girl", Georgy Girl
Foreign Language Film: A Man and a Woman (France)
____________________________________
Stay Tuned.....2001 is up next!!!

